<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 923 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, restoring certain issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, while upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on other matters. The disallowance of bad debts was deleted, depreciation on leased assets was allowed, and software expenses were treated as revenue expenditure. Additionally, subscription to SEBI was allowed, excess cash addition was deleted, and surplus from jewel auction was not added. However, disallowances for filing fees, excess depreciation claimed, interest accrued on securities, and expenditure for tax-free income were upheld. The Tribunal also directed fresh verification on certain issues and rejected challenges to the validity of reopening the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 923 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, restoring certain issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, while upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on other matters. The disallowance of bad debts was deleted, depreciation on leased assets was allowed, and software expenses were treated as revenue expenditure. Additionally, subscription to SEBI was allowed, excess cash addition was deleted, and surplus from jewel auction was not added. However, disallowances for filing fees, excess depreciation claimed, interest accrued on securities, and expenditure for tax-free income were upheld. The Tribunal also directed fresh verification on certain issues and rejected challenges to the validity of reopening the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>