<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 904 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow the addition of Rs.34,58,116/- on account of sticky advances, confirming that interest on Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) should not be included in taxable income until actually received. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the concept of real income and the applicability of Section 43D to cooperative banks like the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 904 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow the addition of Rs.34,58,116/- on account of sticky advances, confirming that interest on Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) should not be included in taxable income until actually received. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the concept of real income and the applicability of Section 43D to cooperative banks like the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>