<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 902 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239725</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision regarding the existence of a business connection in India and the taxability of income remitted from India. The Indian company was treated as an agent, leading to the assessment of income at 5% of the total receipt from cruise activities. The court considered the Canvasser Agency Agreement and the absence of a Double Tax Avoidance Agreement with Isle of Man in reaching its decision. The appellant&#039;s arguments based on previous tribunal decisions and agreements were not sufficient to overturn the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 902 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239725</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision regarding the existence of a business connection in India and the taxability of income remitted from India. The Indian company was treated as an agent, leading to the assessment of income at 5% of the total receipt from cruise activities. The court considered the Canvasser Agency Agreement and the absence of a Double Tax Avoidance Agreement with Isle of Man in reaching its decision. The appellant&#039;s arguments based on previous tribunal decisions and agreements were not sufficient to overturn the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>