<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 896 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the grounds related to Section 14A, directing further verification by the AO. It decided against the AO regarding the rebate under Section 88E, affirming that the rebate is applicable even under MAT provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 896 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the grounds related to Section 14A, directing further verification by the AO. It decided against the AO regarding the rebate under Section 88E, affirming that the rebate is applicable even under MAT provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>