<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 889 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239712</link>
    <description>The judge upheld the confiscation of waste paper and a truck, along with fines and penalties, rejecting the appeal challenging the original order. The court determined that BIFR proceedings do not apply to seizure and confiscation under the Customs Act, confirming a redemption fine for the truck. The decision was based on legal arguments presented, concluding that relief based on BIFR proceedings was not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 889 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239712</link>
      <description>The judge upheld the confiscation of waste paper and a truck, along with fines and penalties, rejecting the appeal challenging the original order. The court determined that BIFR proceedings do not apply to seizure and confiscation under the Customs Act, confirming a redemption fine for the truck. The decision was based on legal arguments presented, concluding that relief based on BIFR proceedings was not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>