https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159307 A referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's refusal to state a case on whether rice bran oil was "edible oil" liable to tax at 1% under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Because the earlier decision treated as conclusive had been set aside, the issue was no longer governed by a settled view, and the controversy whether rice bran oil was fit for human consumption remained a legal question arising from the Tribunal's order. The Court held that the Tribunal's refusal to refer the question was unsustainable and directed it to transmit the statement of the case to the Court. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:40:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159307 A referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's refusal to state a case on whether rice bran oil was "edible oil" liable to tax at 1% under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Because the earlier decision treated as conclusive had been set aside, the issue was no longer governed by a settled view, and the controversy whether rice bran oil was fit for human consumption remained a legal question arising from the Tribunal's order. The Court held that the Tribunal's refusal to refer the question was unsustainable and directed it to transmit the statement of the case to the Court. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159307