<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 518 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159301</link>
    <description>Where the statute provides an efficacious appeal capable of examining both law and disputed facts, a direct challenge to seizure, luxury tax assessment, and the demand notice will ordinarily not be entertained in original jurisdiction. The West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994 provides for assessment, appeal, revision, and review, and the search-and-seizure power under section 13(1) may be exercised where evasion is suspected. Because the validity of the seizure and related matters such as the receipt, endorsement, and time allowed for assessment involved contested factual questions, the Tribunal treated the appellate remedy as the proper course and declined to decide the merits of the challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 518 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159301</link>
      <description>Where the statute provides an efficacious appeal capable of examining both law and disputed facts, a direct challenge to seizure, luxury tax assessment, and the demand notice will ordinarily not be entertained in original jurisdiction. The West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994 provides for assessment, appeal, revision, and review, and the search-and-seizure power under section 13(1) may be exercised where evasion is suspected. Because the validity of the seizure and related matters such as the receipt, endorsement, and time allowed for assessment involved contested factual questions, the Tribunal treated the appellate remedy as the proper course and declined to decide the merits of the challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>