<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 617 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159296</link>
    <description>Section 8-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 permits deduction of the tax component through the prescribed formula only where the tax is embedded in the sale price and not separately charged. The proviso excludes deduction where the dealer has already collected the tax and it is otherwise deducted from the aggregate of sale prices. Accordingly, the formula does not apply to central sales tax separately charged and collected, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 617 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159296</link>
      <description>Section 8-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 permits deduction of the tax component through the prescribed formula only where the tax is embedded in the sale price and not separately charged. The proviso excludes deduction where the dealer has already collected the tax and it is otherwise deducted from the aggregate of sale prices. Accordingly, the formula does not apply to central sales tax separately charged and collected, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>