<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 539 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159289</link>
    <description>Transfers of cement to separately registered sister units were treated as taxable sales because the units maintained distinct accounts, the movement was not shown to be a mere stock transfer, and the cement was issued onward for construction work. Use of cement purchased on form IV for construction or other self-consumption also violated the declared user condition in the fifth proviso to section 5(1), since concessional purchase was permitted only for specified manufacturing or power-related purposes. The taxable turnover for that contravention was the value of the materials purchased on form IV. Both issues were decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 539 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159289</link>
      <description>Transfers of cement to separately registered sister units were treated as taxable sales because the units maintained distinct accounts, the movement was not shown to be a mere stock transfer, and the cement was issued onward for construction work. Use of cement purchased on form IV for construction or other self-consumption also violated the declared user condition in the fifth proviso to section 5(1), since concessional purchase was permitted only for specified manufacturing or power-related purposes. The taxable turnover for that contravention was the value of the materials purchased on form IV. Both issues were decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>