<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 499 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159281</link>
    <description>A circular issued by the Commercial Taxes Department could not direct rejection of G forms for sale of beedi leaves so as to deny the concessional rate under section 5-B of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Act granted the concession where goods were sold for use as raw material in manufacture, subject to a prescribed G form declaration, and an executive instruction could not override that statutory entitlement. Suspected misuse or false declarations had to be dealt with through the statutory machinery, not by a blanket ban. The circular was therefore illegal and ultra vires to that extent, and G forms had to be accepted if otherwise in order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:53:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 499 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159281</link>
      <description>A circular issued by the Commercial Taxes Department could not direct rejection of G forms for sale of beedi leaves so as to deny the concessional rate under section 5-B of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Act granted the concession where goods were sold for use as raw material in manufacture, subject to a prescribed G form declaration, and an executive instruction could not override that statutory entitlement. Suspected misuse or false declarations had to be dealt with through the statutory machinery, not by a blanket ban. The circular was therefore illegal and ultra vires to that extent, and G forms had to be accepted if otherwise in order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>