<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 572 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159275</link>
    <description>Exemption under an incentive scheme was treated as conditional on fulfilment of statutory requirements, including the certificate of authorisation, so the earlier assessment could be cancelled and tax levied on inter-State sales. The Court noted that the cancellation was made after considering the record and the later legal position declared by the Supreme Court in the Pine Chemicals review decision. It also stated that a mere dismissal of an SLP in limine does not decide any legal question and cannot override binding law laid down in a reasoned Supreme Court ruling. On that basis, the impugned order was held lawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 572 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159275</link>
      <description>Exemption under an incentive scheme was treated as conditional on fulfilment of statutory requirements, including the certificate of authorisation, so the earlier assessment could be cancelled and tax levied on inter-State sales. The Court noted that the cancellation was made after considering the record and the later legal position declared by the Supreme Court in the Pine Chemicals review decision. It also stated that a mere dismissal of an SLP in limine does not decide any legal question and cannot override binding law laid down in a reasoned Supreme Court ruling. On that basis, the impugned order was held lawful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>