<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 403 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159272</link>
    <description>Counter-sales of gems, jewellery and similar goods to foreign tourists under an export promotion scheme were held to be local sales because a sale is protected as being in the course of export only where there is an integral link with actual export; purchase against foreign exchange and an undertaking not to resell in India were insufficient. Interest on the assessed tax was not leviable for the relevant period because the amendment extending section 11-B applied only from 1 April 1987. Reassessment was validly initiated where disclosed counter-sales had escaped proper assessment, as the statutory phrase &quot;for any reason whatever&quot; was wide enough to cover such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:03:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 403 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159272</link>
      <description>Counter-sales of gems, jewellery and similar goods to foreign tourists under an export promotion scheme were held to be local sales because a sale is protected as being in the course of export only where there is an integral link with actual export; purchase against foreign exchange and an undertaking not to resell in India were insufficient. Interest on the assessed tax was not leviable for the relevant period because the amendment extending section 11-B applied only from 1 April 1987. Reassessment was validly initiated where disclosed counter-sales had escaped proper assessment, as the statutory phrase &quot;for any reason whatever&quot; was wide enough to cover such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>