<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 869 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239692</link>
    <description>Earlier adverse adjudication on the same activity justified a substantial pre-deposit as a condition for admitting the service tax appeal. The Tribunal treated the prior decision against the assessee as relevant to the interim relief sought, and directed deposit of 50% of the disputed tax amount. The balance pre-deposit was waived, and recovery of the remaining demand was stayed during the pendency of the appeal subject to compliance with the deposit condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 869 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239692</link>
      <description>Earlier adverse adjudication on the same activity justified a substantial pre-deposit as a condition for admitting the service tax appeal. The Tribunal treated the prior decision against the assessee as relevant to the interim relief sought, and directed deposit of 50% of the disputed tax amount. The balance pre-deposit was waived, and recovery of the remaining demand was stayed during the pendency of the appeal subject to compliance with the deposit condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>