https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239670 The appeal was allowed only in part, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The disallowance of CENVAT credit on materials for support structures was upheld, and the appellant was held liable for interest as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal precedents and interpretations guiding decisions on admissibility of credit, penalty imposition, and interest charges under relevant CENVAT Credit Rules. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239670 The appeal was allowed only in part, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The disallowance of CENVAT credit on materials for support structures was upheld, and the appellant was held liable for interest as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal precedents and interpretations guiding decisions on admissibility of credit, penalty imposition, and interest charges under relevant CENVAT Credit Rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239670