https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159250 Readiness and willingness to perform a reconveyance contract were upheld on the basis of pre-suit notices and surrounding circumstances, and the Court recognised that a second appellate court may correct concurrent findings where material evidence was ignored or the factual approach was erroneous. It further held that, under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, compensation may be awarded in substitution for specific performance when the contract becomes incapable of execution without fault of the plaintiff. The property's acquisition during litigation did not bar relief, and the decree was moulded into monetary compensation linked to the acquisition award, subject to deduction for the defendant's services and expenses. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159250 Readiness and willingness to perform a reconveyance contract were upheld on the basis of pre-suit notices and surrounding circumstances, and the Court recognised that a second appellate court may correct concurrent findings where material evidence was ignored or the factual approach was erroneous. It further held that, under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, compensation may be awarded in substitution for specific performance when the contract becomes incapable of execution without fault of the plaintiff. The property's acquisition during litigation did not bar relief, and the decree was moulded into monetary compensation linked to the acquisition award, subject to deduction for the defendant's services and expenses. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159250