<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 832 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239655</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the surrender of tenancy rights did not result in taxable capital gains as no actual income was earned during the relevant year. The tribunal emphasized that tax liability is based on realized income, not on unrealized agreements. The appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, affirming the non-taxability of the alleged capital gains from the tenancy rights surrender.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 832 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239655</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the surrender of tenancy rights did not result in taxable capital gains as no actual income was earned during the relevant year. The tribunal emphasized that tax liability is based on realized income, not on unrealized agreements. The appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, affirming the non-taxability of the alleged capital gains from the tenancy rights surrender.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>