<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 822 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239645</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order on all issues, directing the A.O. to reassess after providing the assessee with an opportunity to submit relevant evidence. The C.O. filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the Revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal emphasized the burden on the assessee to substantiate expenses and prove the genuineness of sundry creditors, ultimately remanding the matters for fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 822 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239645</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order on all issues, directing the A.O. to reassess after providing the assessee with an opportunity to submit relevant evidence. The C.O. filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the Revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal emphasized the burden on the assessee to substantiate expenses and prove the genuineness of sundry creditors, ultimately remanding the matters for fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>