<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1234 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159236</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi, upheld the order dropping proceedings for violation of FERA and dismissed the appeal challenging it. The Tribunal determined that the Deputy Legal Adviser lacked authority to file the revision on behalf of the Director of Enforcement, citing legal precedents. As a result, the appeal was deemed not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:40:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1234 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159236</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi, upheld the order dropping proceedings for violation of FERA and dismissed the appeal challenging it. The Tribunal determined that the Deputy Legal Adviser lacked authority to file the revision on behalf of the Director of Enforcement, citing legal precedents. As a result, the appeal was deemed not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>