<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 455 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159216</link>
    <description>A rectification notice under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act had to be issued in the prescribed statutory form, so a summons form could not validate proceedings that increased assessment or liability. The prescribed form for such notice was mandatory, and the defect could not be cured by treating a different form as sufficient. The rectification power also could not be used to revive an earlier provisional assessment that had already been cancelled on reopening, because section 17 allowed correction of apparent mistakes only, not restoration of a non-existent order. On that basis, the impugned rectification action and related orders were held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 455 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159216</link>
      <description>A rectification notice under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act had to be issued in the prescribed statutory form, so a summons form could not validate proceedings that increased assessment or liability. The prescribed form for such notice was mandatory, and the defect could not be cured by treating a different form as sufficient. The rectification power also could not be used to revive an earlier provisional assessment that had already been cancelled on reopening, because section 17 allowed correction of apparent mistakes only, not restoration of a non-existent order. On that basis, the impugned rectification action and related orders were held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>