<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 603 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159215</link>
    <description>Rubber cess paid to the Rubber Board was treated as outside purchase turnover, so it was excluded from the taxable base. The exemption under S.R.O. No. 968 of 1980 was also available because the notification applied to goods produced and sold by a new small-scale industrial unit, and the Tribunal found that the outside mixing of carbon black was only a minor preliminary step that did not negate production by the assessee. The eligibility certificate was not in dispute, and no material displaced the factual finding supporting manufacture by the unit. On that basis, the turnover exemption and the exclusion of rubber cess were both sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 603 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159215</link>
      <description>Rubber cess paid to the Rubber Board was treated as outside purchase turnover, so it was excluded from the taxable base. The exemption under S.R.O. No. 968 of 1980 was also available because the notification applied to goods produced and sold by a new small-scale industrial unit, and the Tribunal found that the outside mixing of carbon black was only a minor preliminary step that did not negate production by the assessee. The eligibility certificate was not in dispute, and no material displaced the factual finding supporting manufacture by the unit. On that basis, the turnover exemption and the exclusion of rubber cess were both sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>