<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 585 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159214</link>
    <description>A special tax concession under S.R.O. No. 643/81 for rubber sheets used to manufacture chappals continued to apply for the 1984-85 assessment year despite the later introduction of section 5(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The later provision was treated as a general concession for industrial raw materials and packing materials, operating in a different field and showing no clear legislative intent to override the earlier special notification. The later supersession of S.R.O. No. 643/81 by S.R.O. No. 372/92 also supported that the earlier notification remained effective until then. Technical defects in the declaration form did not defeat entitlement where compliance was substantially achieved, and the concessional 4 per cent rate was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 585 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159214</link>
      <description>A special tax concession under S.R.O. No. 643/81 for rubber sheets used to manufacture chappals continued to apply for the 1984-85 assessment year despite the later introduction of section 5(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The later provision was treated as a general concession for industrial raw materials and packing materials, operating in a different field and showing no clear legislative intent to override the earlier special notification. The later supersession of S.R.O. No. 643/81 by S.R.O. No. 372/92 also supported that the earlier notification remained effective until then. Technical defects in the declaration form did not defeat entitlement where compliance was substantially achieved, and the concessional 4 per cent rate was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>