<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159205</link>
    <description>Revisional proceedings under section 21 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act were held to be valid if initiated within four years, even if concluded later. The Court followed binding local precedent that treats initiation of revision as the ative statutory act, and declined to prefer a contrary view from another High Court on completion within the limitation period. The petitioner&#039;s objection to the factual basis for invoking revision was treated as a matter more appropriately raised in statutory appeal, and the challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159205</link>
      <description>Revisional proceedings under section 21 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act were held to be valid if initiated within four years, even if concluded later. The Court followed binding local precedent that treats initiation of revision as the ative statutory act, and declined to prefer a contrary view from another High Court on completion within the limitation period. The petitioner&#039;s objection to the factual basis for invoking revision was treated as a matter more appropriately raised in statutory appeal, and the challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>