https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159201 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was ordinarily unavailable to challenge levy and recovery of a sales tax penalty where an efficacious statutory appeal existed; the petitioner was relegated to that remedy. The Court also treated the non-disclosure of an earlier writ petition on the same cause of action as an independent ground to refuse relief, since a second writ cannot be entertained without full disclosure of prior proceedings. The penalty challenge was therefore left to be pursued, if at all, under the Act. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:09:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159201 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was ordinarily unavailable to challenge levy and recovery of a sales tax penalty where an efficacious statutory appeal existed; the petitioner was relegated to that remedy. The Court also treated the non-disclosure of an earlier writ petition on the same cause of action as an independent ground to refuse relief, since a second writ cannot be entertained without full disclosure of prior proceedings. The penalty challenge was therefore left to be pursued, if at all, under the Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159201