<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 493 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159191</link>
    <description>Under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, reassessment under section 12-A was held unavailable where the original assessments on raw silk and silk yarn were completed in conformity with a binding circular issued under section 3-A and the Government&#039;s exemption notification under section 8-A. The administrative instructions reflected the prevailing exemption position, and assessments made on that basis could not later be recast as escaped assessments or wrongly allowed exemptions merely because the revenue later adopted a different view. The reassessment orders and proposition notices were therefore invalid and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:37:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 493 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159191</link>
      <description>Under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, reassessment under section 12-A was held unavailable where the original assessments on raw silk and silk yarn were completed in conformity with a binding circular issued under section 3-A and the Government&#039;s exemption notification under section 8-A. The administrative instructions reflected the prevailing exemption position, and assessments made on that basis could not later be recast as escaped assessments or wrongly allowed exemptions merely because the revenue later adopted a different view. The reassessment orders and proposition notices were therefore invalid and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>