<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 548 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159183</link>
    <description>For purposes of Explanation 1 to section 5-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, the term &quot;timber&quot; was treated in its ordinary and commercial sense, and not by reference to the broader classification in the Second Schedule. Timber and veneer were regarded as distinct commercial commodities: timber meant wood in its accepted form, while veneer was a thin sheet manufactured from timber and sold separately. The later insertion of the words &quot;other than veneers&quot; was described as explanatory and intended to remove confusion created by departmental clarification. On that basis, veneers were not included within &quot;timber&quot; for section 5-A, and sales of veneers against form No. 37 were eligible for concessional tax treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:08:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 548 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159183</link>
      <description>For purposes of Explanation 1 to section 5-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, the term &quot;timber&quot; was treated in its ordinary and commercial sense, and not by reference to the broader classification in the Second Schedule. Timber and veneer were regarded as distinct commercial commodities: timber meant wood in its accepted form, while veneer was a thin sheet manufactured from timber and sold separately. The later insertion of the words &quot;other than veneers&quot; was described as explanatory and intended to remove confusion created by departmental clarification. On that basis, veneers were not included within &quot;timber&quot; for section 5-A, and sales of veneers against form No. 37 were eligible for concessional tax treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>