https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159166 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was held unavailable where the petitioner challenged assessment orders and notices despite an effective statutory remedy of appeal or revision under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The Court applied the settled rule that an alternative remedy ordinarily bars writ relief, with greater strictness in tax matters, and rejected the argument that a tax-deposit condition for appeal justified bypassing the statutory process. The writ petition was dismissed for failure to exhaust the available appellate remedy. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:22:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159166 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was held unavailable where the petitioner challenged assessment orders and notices despite an effective statutory remedy of appeal or revision under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The Court applied the settled rule that an alternative remedy ordinarily bars writ relief, with greater strictness in tax matters, and rejected the argument that a tax-deposit condition for appeal justified bypassing the statutory process. The writ petition was dismissed for failure to exhaust the available appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159166