<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 814 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, concluding that the provisions of section 68 did not apply to the trade recoveries made during the year. The Tribunal found that the cash deposits were trade receipts from debt recoveries supported by evidence in the books, not unexplained income. The addition of Rs. 2,75,97,214/- towards unexplained cash credit was deleted, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 814 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, concluding that the provisions of section 68 did not apply to the trade recoveries made during the year. The Tribunal found that the cash deposits were trade receipts from debt recoveries supported by evidence in the books, not unexplained income. The addition of Rs. 2,75,97,214/- towards unexplained cash credit was deleted, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>