<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239636</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed both the department&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals regarding the assessment of consideration received for the property &#039;Indraprastha.&#039; The tribunal determined that the transaction involving the construction of residential units on the property was not a commercial arrangement but rather the utilization of a capital asset. Citing previous decisions and the nature of the transaction, the tribunal upheld the treatment of the consideration as capital gains, in line with the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, both appeals were rejected, affirming the assessment under &quot;capital gains&quot; rather than &quot;business income.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239636</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed both the department&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals regarding the assessment of consideration received for the property &#039;Indraprastha.&#039; The tribunal determined that the transaction involving the construction of residential units on the property was not a commercial arrangement but rather the utilization of a capital asset. Citing previous decisions and the nature of the transaction, the tribunal upheld the treatment of the consideration as capital gains, in line with the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, both appeals were rejected, affirming the assessment under &quot;capital gains&quot; rather than &quot;business income.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>