<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 808 - ITAT  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239631</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the revenue was dismissed. The tribunal found that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not supported by material evidence. The CIT(A) correctly applied legal principles in deleting the additions under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 808 - ITAT  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239631</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the revenue was dismissed. The tribunal found that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not supported by material evidence. The CIT(A) correctly applied legal principles in deleting the additions under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>