<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 641 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159162</link>
    <description>Electronic toys fall within the broad electronic goods entry in Part B of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Schedule rather than the residual item, because a specific and comprehensive tariff entry prevails over a residuary one. The Tribunal also ruled that a Commissioner&#039;s letter or clarification has no statutory force and cannot alter the classification or tax incidence fixed by the Schedule. On that basis, revised notices and assessment orders issued only on the strength of the administrative clarification were unsustainable, while the earlier classification under entry 50 remained correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 641 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159162</link>
      <description>Electronic toys fall within the broad electronic goods entry in Part B of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Schedule rather than the residual item, because a specific and comprehensive tariff entry prevails over a residuary one. The Tribunal also ruled that a Commissioner&#039;s letter or clarification has no statutory force and cannot alter the classification or tax incidence fixed by the Schedule. On that basis, revised notices and assessment orders issued only on the strength of the administrative clarification were unsustainable, while the earlier classification under entry 50 remained correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>