<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 765 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239588</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, permitting the simultaneous imposition of penalties under sections 76 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act for the period before 10.05.2008. The decision emphasized that penalties under both sections can be imposed concurrently on an assessee. The judgment was delivered by Mr. H.K. Thakur on 03.09.13, overturning the earlier decision of the OIA and supporting the Revenue&#039;s position on the imposition of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 765 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239588</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, permitting the simultaneous imposition of penalties under sections 76 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act for the period before 10.05.2008. The decision emphasized that penalties under both sections can be imposed concurrently on an assessee. The judgment was delivered by Mr. H.K. Thakur on 03.09.13, overturning the earlier decision of the OIA and supporting the Revenue&#039;s position on the imposition of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>