<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 851 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159140</link>
    <description>SC dismissed appeal where appellant failed to disclose material facts and misrepresented circumstances to create false impression that state instrumentality violated natural justice principles. Court found appellant&#039;s conduct improper in withholding facts and presenting case in self-serving manner. On merits, no grounds existed to interfere with respondent&#039;s action or HC order. Appeal dismissed on both procedural impropriety and lack of substantive merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 12:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 851 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159140</link>
      <description>SC dismissed appeal where appellant failed to disclose material facts and misrepresented circumstances to create false impression that state instrumentality violated natural justice principles. Court found appellant&#039;s conduct improper in withholding facts and presenting case in self-serving manner. On merits, no grounds existed to interfere with respondent&#039;s action or HC order. Appeal dismissed on both procedural impropriety and lack of substantive merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>