<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 547 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159137</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was stated to run from service of the reassessment notice, and a later draft order stage did not change the statutory start of limitation. A stay granted after the limitation period had already expired could not revive time-barred proceedings or extend limitation. The note also states that the power to stay assessment proceedings under the first proviso to section 42(1) is confined to extraordinary, supervening reasons; a stay entered merely for additional time does not satisfy that requirement and cannot exclude the relevant period. On that basis, the impugned assessment and reassessment orders, related stay orders, and demand notices were set aside as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 547 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159137</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was stated to run from service of the reassessment notice, and a later draft order stage did not change the statutory start of limitation. A stay granted after the limitation period had already expired could not revive time-barred proceedings or extend limitation. The note also states that the power to stay assessment proceedings under the first proviso to section 42(1) is confined to extraordinary, supervening reasons; a stay entered merely for additional time does not satisfy that requirement and cannot exclude the relevant period. On that basis, the impugned assessment and reassessment orders, related stay orders, and demand notices were set aside as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>