<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 508 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159131</link>
    <description>Under G.O. Ms. No. 763, Revenue (CT.II), dated 21 August 1990, the set-off on a subsequent sale of iron and steel was to operate on the tax already suffered in the State against the tax payable on the later sale. Restricting relief only to the tax collected component was impermissible, because the scheme contemplated set-off of actual tax paid. The view that the available set-off could not be confined to the collected portion was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:40:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 508 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159131</link>
      <description>Under G.O. Ms. No. 763, Revenue (CT.II), dated 21 August 1990, the set-off on a subsequent sale of iron and steel was to operate on the tax already suffered in the State against the tax payable on the later sale. Restricting relief only to the tax collected component was impermissible, because the scheme contemplated set-off of actual tax paid. The view that the available set-off could not be confined to the collected portion was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>