https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239570 The court clarified that recovery proceedings should not be initiated when appeals with stay applications are pending, especially if no stay has been granted for reasons not attributable to the petitioners. It emphasized timely hearings on appeals and interim applications, directing no coercive recovery steps during such pendency. The judgment instructed the appellate authority/CESTAT to promptly decide stay applications within eight weeks of appearance, restraining coercive recovery actions during this period. The petitioner was ordered to appear before the appellate authority/CESTAT on a specified date, with a prohibition on coercive measures during the stay application process. en-us Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239570 The court clarified that recovery proceedings should not be initiated when appeals with stay applications are pending, especially if no stay has been granted for reasons not attributable to the petitioners. It emphasized timely hearings on appeals and interim applications, directing no coercive recovery steps during such pendency. The judgment instructed the appellate authority/CESTAT to promptly decide stay applications within eight weeks of appearance, restraining coercive recovery actions during this period. The petitioner was ordered to appear before the appellate authority/CESTAT on a specified date, with a prohibition on coercive measures during the stay application process. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239570