https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239566 The appellant, engaged in manufacturing, availed CENVAT Credit on certain items. The issue was whether these items were capital goods or inputs for manufacturing excisable goods. The Tribunal found that the items were used in manufacturing capital goods, justifying the availed credit. The appellant demonstrated the use of items in manufacturing capital goods, leading to the appeal being allowed, and the impugned order set aside. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239566 The appellant, engaged in manufacturing, availed CENVAT Credit on certain items. The issue was whether these items were capital goods or inputs for manufacturing excisable goods. The Tribunal found that the items were used in manufacturing capital goods, justifying the availed credit. The appellant demonstrated the use of items in manufacturing capital goods, leading to the appeal being allowed, and the impugned order set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239566