<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 741 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, upholding the penalty under Rule 15(1), and ordering the refund of the excess amount paid by the appellant. The appellant&#039;s misunderstanding of legal provisions regarding duty payment on imported tee nuts was noted, leading to the decision to refund the excess amount and dismiss the penalty under Rule 15(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 741 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, upholding the penalty under Rule 15(1), and ordering the refund of the excess amount paid by the appellant. The appellant&#039;s misunderstanding of legal provisions regarding duty payment on imported tee nuts was noted, leading to the decision to refund the excess amount and dismiss the penalty under Rule 15(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>