https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239559 The court addressed issues related to search and seizure operations at the petitioner's residence, detention of cash and jewellery despite no tax liability, and attachment of immovable property by the Tax Recovery Officer. The income tax department was directed to release the seized items upon the petitioner's application to the designated officer, subject to approval. The court emphasized the need for justification to retain possession of assets in the absence of tax liability, allowing the petitioner to seek release of the cash and jewellery through proper channels within a specified timeframe. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239559 The court addressed issues related to search and seizure operations at the petitioner's residence, detention of cash and jewellery despite no tax liability, and attachment of immovable property by the Tax Recovery Officer. The income tax department was directed to release the seized items upon the petitioner's application to the designated officer, subject to approval. The court emphasized the need for justification to retain possession of assets in the absence of tax liability, allowing the petitioner to seek release of the cash and jewellery through proper channels within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239559