<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 722 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239545</link>
    <description>The appeals of the department were dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The matter was restored to the A.O. for reconsideration, specifically regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to Mrs. Mukta Chaudhary and the charging of interest under sections 234A and 234B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 722 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239545</link>
      <description>The appeals of the department were dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The matter was restored to the A.O. for reconsideration, specifically regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to Mrs. Mukta Chaudhary and the charging of interest under sections 234A and 234B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>