<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1080 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It ruled that payments for procedural lapses were part of the purchase consideration, computer peripherals qualify for higher depreciation, interest income linked to renovation reduces construction costs, landscaping expenses are integral to buildings, and liabilities do not cease merely due to time passage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1080 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It ruled that payments for procedural lapses were part of the purchase consideration, computer peripherals qualify for higher depreciation, interest income linked to renovation reduces construction costs, landscaping expenses are integral to buildings, and liabilities do not cease merely due to time passage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>