<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Average Cost Process Insufficient for Undervaluation Claims; Actual Costs Must Be Evaluated for Each Consignment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15820</link>
    <description>Undervaluation of goods or not – Profit accrued from transportation charges adopting average cost process is not determining factor while actual cost incurred in respect of each consignment under consideration needed testing to make an allegation of undervaluation. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:56:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Average Cost Process Insufficient for Undervaluation Claims; Actual Costs Must Be Evaluated for Each Consignment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15820</link>
      <description>Undervaluation of goods or not – Profit accrued from transportation charges adopting average cost process is not determining factor while actual cost incurred in respect of each consignment under consideration needed testing to make an allegation of undervaluation. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:56:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>