<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 718 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239541</link>
    <description>Non-production of account books at the time of survey can justify rejection of the books where the assessee is expected to keep true and correct accounts available for inspection. Reading the obligation to maintain proper books under section 12 with the inspection and search powers under section 13 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the court treated failure to produce the books during survey as a relevant circumstance for doubting the correctness and completeness of the return. The assessee also had to explain the non-production, and prior rejection of the same books in earlier years reinforced the adverse inference. The books were therefore rejected in the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 718 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239541</link>
      <description>Non-production of account books at the time of survey can justify rejection of the books where the assessee is expected to keep true and correct accounts available for inspection. Reading the obligation to maintain proper books under section 12 with the inspection and search powers under section 13 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the court treated failure to produce the books during survey as a relevant circumstance for doubting the correctness and completeness of the return. The assessee also had to explain the non-production, and prior rejection of the same books in earlier years reinforced the adverse inference. The books were therefore rejected in the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>