<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 714 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239537</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was prima facie held admissible where a job worker had discharged service tax, was registered, and issued invoices for paid consideration. In the absence of any action against the job worker or any finding that the tax paid was not service tax, denial of credit to the appellant was considered unsustainable at the stay stage. The job worker&#039;s exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST did not, on these facts, justify denial of credit to the appellant. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted till disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 714 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239537</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was prima facie held admissible where a job worker had discharged service tax, was registered, and issued invoices for paid consideration. In the absence of any action against the job worker or any finding that the tax paid was not service tax, denial of credit to the appellant was considered unsustainable at the stay stage. The job worker&#039;s exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST did not, on these facts, justify denial of credit to the appellant. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted till disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>