<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 712 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the distinct nature of handling and transportation services, correctly taxed separately as per the Circular and legal provisions. The decision highlighted the importance of showing charges separately in invoices to determine the appropriate Service Tax liability for each service provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 712 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the distinct nature of handling and transportation services, correctly taxed separately as per the Circular and legal provisions. The decision highlighted the importance of showing charges separately in invoices to determine the appropriate Service Tax liability for each service provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>