<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 711 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a dispute concerning the classification of renting out premises as Mandap Keeper Service for Service Tax purposes. The Tribunal determined that the activity did not meet the criteria of temporary occupation necessary for Mandap Keeper Service, as defined in the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for Service Tax was deemed unsustainable in law, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specific legal definitions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 711 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a dispute concerning the classification of renting out premises as Mandap Keeper Service for Service Tax purposes. The Tribunal determined that the activity did not meet the criteria of temporary occupation necessary for Mandap Keeper Service, as defined in the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for Service Tax was deemed unsustainable in law, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specific legal definitions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>