<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 545 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159119</link>
    <description>Purchase tax under section 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was leviable where the goods remained taxable under the Act, even though sales by a newly set up small-scale industrial unit were exempt under a notification limited to that class of sellers. The exemption operated only at the seller&#039;s level and did not amount to a total exemption of the commodity at all stages of sale. Earlier decisions on complete commodity exemption were distinguished, and authorities applying purchase tax to class-based exemptions were followed. The assessee&#039;s purchase of resin was therefore taxable in its hands, and the contrary view of the Tribunal was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 545 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159119</link>
      <description>Purchase tax under section 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was leviable where the goods remained taxable under the Act, even though sales by a newly set up small-scale industrial unit were exempt under a notification limited to that class of sellers. The exemption operated only at the seller&#039;s level and did not amount to a total exemption of the commodity at all stages of sale. Earlier decisions on complete commodity exemption were distinguished, and authorities applying purchase tax to class-based exemptions were followed. The assessee&#039;s purchase of resin was therefore taxable in its hands, and the contrary view of the Tribunal was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>