<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 386 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159113</link>
    <description>A deferment order under section 12(6)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act can exclude time from the section 12(5) limitation only if it is based on valid reasons, made within the running limitation period, and communicated to the assessee after notice. A unilateral or uncommunicated deferment order cannot defeat the assessee&#039;s accrued limitation defence, and administrative reasons alone are insufficient to invoke the power. On the stated facts, most deferment-based assessments and reassessments were time-barred, while one reassessment under section 12-A was upheld because the notice was issued within the applicable limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 386 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159113</link>
      <description>A deferment order under section 12(6)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act can exclude time from the section 12(5) limitation only if it is based on valid reasons, made within the running limitation period, and communicated to the assessee after notice. A unilateral or uncommunicated deferment order cannot defeat the assessee&#039;s accrued limitation defence, and administrative reasons alone are insufficient to invoke the power. On the stated facts, most deferment-based assessments and reassessments were time-barred, while one reassessment under section 12-A was upheld because the notice was issued within the applicable limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>