https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239522 Interim stay of a customs valuation order was declined because the appellant did not place evidence supporting its challenge to the Special Valuation Branch loading. The Tribunal found that the plea based on the supplier's amended pricing policy had not been effectively raised before the original authority, and it took the appellant's conduct and the absence of any convincing case for interim interference into account. On the material presented, no basis was shown for granting stay, so the application was rejected. en-us Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239522 Interim stay of a customs valuation order was declined because the appellant did not place evidence supporting its challenge to the Special Valuation Branch loading. The Tribunal found that the plea based on the supplier's amended pricing policy had not been effectively raised before the original authority, and it took the appellant's conduct and the absence of any convincing case for interim interference into account. On the material presented, no basis was shown for granting stay, so the application was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239522