<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 692 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239515</link>
    <description>Exemption from excise duty on intermediate goods under Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 requires strict observance of the prescribed procedure. The Constitution Bench ruling treats that procedure as mandatory because it verifies receipt of the goods by the recipient unit and their actual utilisation, and guards against diversion or misuse under the guise of exemption. A plea of substantial compliance based only on records at the recipient end is therefore insufficient to satisfy the remission conditions. The exemption claim must be supported by full procedural compliance, and the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 692 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239515</link>
      <description>Exemption from excise duty on intermediate goods under Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 requires strict observance of the prescribed procedure. The Constitution Bench ruling treats that procedure as mandatory because it verifies receipt of the goods by the recipient unit and their actual utilisation, and guards against diversion or misuse under the guise of exemption. A plea of substantial compliance based only on records at the recipient end is therefore insufficient to satisfy the remission conditions. The exemption claim must be supported by full procedural compliance, and the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>