https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239510 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI directed two registered dealers to deposit specified amounts within four weeks for issuing invoices without supplying defective bars to a manufacturer, who allegedly used fake invoices. The Tribunal found that the dealers failed to justify a complete waiver of penalties under Rule 25/26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Upon compliance, the remaining penalty amount was conditionally waived, and recovery stayed pending appeals, emphasizing adherence to regulatory requirements and transparency in commercial transactions to maintain the integrity of the excise system. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239510 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI directed two registered dealers to deposit specified amounts within four weeks for issuing invoices without supplying defective bars to a manufacturer, who allegedly used fake invoices. The Tribunal found that the dealers failed to justify a complete waiver of penalties under Rule 25/26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Upon compliance, the remaining penalty amount was conditionally waived, and recovery stayed pending appeals, emphasizing adherence to regulatory requirements and transparency in commercial transactions to maintain the integrity of the excise system. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239510